TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Anyone running 12.99 or faster under NHRA rules requires a
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject Anyone running 12.99 or faster under NHRA rules requires a
     
Posted by Z-Jay (Edmonton) on January 28, 2002 at 12:18 AM
  This message has been viewed 68 times.
     
In Reply To I've never heard of NE1 impaled by drive shaft. It's just posted by FLYT300 on January 27, 2002 at 06:37 PM
     
Message "driveshaft loop" to be installed on your car to help hold a driveshaft in place in case a u-joint fails. One possible result is the pole-vault effect. The other misfortune would be the shaft piercing through the car. The NHRA didn't simply make this up. There is some factual basis for the risk.

My only point was, given approximately equal weight savings between the CF and aluminum driveshafts, the reason to go for the CF then would have to be the safety aspect (as well as better balancing - supposedly).

I didn't say go out and buy a CF driveshaft just because its safe. What I meant was if you're comparing the aluminum to the CF and they weigh close to the same, but the aluminum is way cheaper... why would anyone buy the CF?? Because in addition to the weight savings, you ALSO get the safety benefit.

: not a risk that requires changing to a CF drive shaft.

Z-Jay
Edmonton Z Car Club
93 300ZX TT - Stage V
01 Sentra SE - daily driver

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.